The Syllabus, Honestly
Four pillars, each appearing on every USAMO/USAJMO: (1) ALGEBRA — inequalities (AM–GM, Cauchy–Schwarz, Schur, rearrangement, Jensen/convexity, smoothing, SOS), polynomials (Vieta, roots of unity, integer-coefficient divisibility), functional equations (substitution, Cauchy's equation, injectivity/surjectivity arguments), sequences and recurrences; (2) NUMBER THEORY — divisibility and gcd, modular arithmetic and orders, primitive roots, lifting the exponent, Vieta jumping, Diophantine equations, p-adic valuations, Zsigmondy as a citable tool; (3) COMBINATORICS — pigeonhole, extremal principle, invariants and monovariants, double counting, bijections, induction on structures, graph theory (degrees, trees, bipartite, Turán/Mantel), games and strategies, coloring arguments; (4) GEOMETRY — angle chasing, similar triangles, power of a point and radical axes, cyclic quadrilaterals, Ceva/Menelaus, homothety and spiral similarity, inversion, complex/coordinate bash as a last resort.
Six problems over two days, points each, full proofs required. Graders reward complete rigorous arguments; a correct answer without proof earns . Write-ups matter: state what you are proving, label lemmas, handle equality cases and edge cases explicitly, and never skip the "why" of a claimed step. Problems 1 and 4 are entry-level; 3 and 6 are the hardest.
Four Pillars, Four Problems
A USAMO problem 1 or 4 is short to state and has a solution of one or two ideas, each of which must be proved. The four problems below are at that level, one per pillar; together they use AM–GM with chosen weights, a telescoping product, a counting argument by adding objects one at a time, and similar triangles from inscribed angles.
Work each one before reading its solution, and time yourself: a problem-1 idea should appear within thirty minutes, and the write-up should fit on one page. If an area feels slow, that is the pillar to study first. The solutions also model the expected write-up: claims stated, every step justified by a named fact, equality cases and edge cases handled.
Prove that for all positive reals .
Step 1 — by AM–GM on three terms, . Likewise and .
Step 2 — adding, the left sides total , which gives the claim. Equality needs , , : only .
How to find it. To produce by AM–GM from cubes, the exponents must average to : two copies of and one of .
Let . Prove that , and deduce that any two Fermat numbers are coprime.
Step 1 — induction on . For : . If , then multiplying by gives .
Step 2 — if divides and with , then divides the product , hence . Fermat numbers are odd, so . Since each has a prime factor and these are all different, there are infinitely many primes.
How to find it. factors as a difference of squares again and again: . Unrolling that is the product formula.
points are placed on a circle and every two are joined by a chord, with no three chords passing through one interior point. Prove that the disc is cut into regions.
Step 1 — draw the chords one at a time. A new chord that crosses earlier chords (at distinct interior points) is cut into arcs, and each arc splits one existing region into two. So it adds regions.
Step 2 — summing over all chords, the number of regions is .
Step 3 — there are chords, and each crossing point is the crossing of the two diagonals of exactly one quadrilateral with vertices among the points; conversely each points give exactly one crossing. So there are crossing points, and the total is . For : .
How to find it. Regions are hard to count directly; how many each new chord creates is easy. Build the figure one piece at a time and count what each piece adds.
In triangle the bisector of angle meets at and the circumcircle again at . Prove that .
Step 1 — , since both are inscribed angles on the arc .
Step 2 — because bisects angle . So .
Step 3 — triangles and share the angle at and have , so they are similar: , i.e. . Read as a tangent–secant product, it says that line is tangent to the circle through , , .
How to find it. A product of two lengths along one line through equals a square: look for two similar triangles sharing the vertex . The bisector supplies one equal angle, the circle the other.
Small cases are evidence, not proof. are all prime, and Fermat conjectured that every is. Euler found . The coprimality proved above is a theorem; “all Fermat numbers are prime” was a pattern.
With points on a circle in general position, how many regions do all the chords create?
Show the answerHide the answer
.
What the First Hour Looks Like
Compute the smallest cases by hand and put them in a table. Guess the pattern. Then prove it in both directions: the guessed objects work (usually a construction), and nothing else does (usually an invariant or a counting argument).
The table is not a warm-up; for most “find all” problems it IS the discovery step, because the answer is visible by or . Writing the cases systematically also exposes the mechanism: the cases that fail tend to fail for the same reason, and that reason is the impossibility proof. The discipline is to treat the guess as unproved until both halves are written — the next section's warning is a pattern that holds for five cases and then fails.
For which is there a permutation of such that the numbers are distinct modulo ?
Step 1 — table. : yes. : the permutations and give sums and , both repeated mod — no. : gives — yes. : a search of the permutations finds none. Guess: exactly the odd .
Step 2 — odd work: take . The sums are distinct mod because is invertible mod .
Step 3 — even fail. If the were distinct mod , they would be in some order, with sum (since is odd). But . As , contradiction.
How to find it. The table shows odd work with the identity; for the failures, compute the one quantity every candidate shares — the total sum — both ways.
Which positive integers can be written as a sum of two or more consecutive positive integers?
Step 1 — table: , , , , , , ; the failures up to are . Guess: all except powers of .
Step 2 — a sum of consecutive integers starting at is , so . The two factors differ by , an odd number, so one is odd, and both exceed (, ). So has an odd factor greater than , and is not a power of .
Step 3 — conversely, if has an odd divisor , write with even, so . Put and ; then is a positive integer (the difference of an odd and an even number is odd). So is such a sum. Example: , , : , , and .
How to find it. The table's failures are — powers of two announce themselves. Then write the sum in closed form; the factorization with factors of opposite parity is the whole proof.
Tables can lie. For the chord regions of the previous section, give regions, and “” is an irresistible guess. At the count is . A pattern is a conjecture until a proof explains it; here the proof (chords plus crossings) shows the answer is a polynomial of degree , which can agree with only for a few .
For which can be split into two sets with equal sums? Make a table, guess, and prove both directions.
Show the answerHide the answer
Table: () and () work; fail; work. Guess: or . Necessity: the total must be even, which happens exactly when . Sufficiency: for , split into blocks and give to one side and to the other. For , split as and treat the rest, , in blocks of four the same way.