Spectral Reasoning
If has eigenvalues then has eigenvalues : , , .
A matrix with eigenvalues has — no entries needed. Trace and determinant are the first two symmetric functions of the spectrum; Newton's identities convert power sums into the characteristic polynomial and back. If for , then all eigenvalues vanish and is nilpotent — a classic Putnam lemma. A picture: has eigenvectors and with eigenvalues and , so — and directly, has determinant .
Every matrix satisfies its own characteristic polynomial: . For : .
Consequences: is a combination of , so powers reduce; is a polynomial in when ; and a matrix with (idempotent) or (involution) or (nilpotent) has eigenvalues confined to the roots of the corresponding polynomial — , , . Rank of an idempotent equals its trace. These one-liners decide many "show that" problems.
— pick columns one at a time, each outside the span of the previous.
(); ; . The number of -dimensional subspaces of is the Gaussian binomial . Over , "how many symmetric / nilpotent / invertible matrices" problems all reduce to this counting-by-columns template.
Real eigenvalues, orthogonal eigenvectors, diagonalizable — so on the unit sphere ranges over (the Rayleigh quotient). Positive definiteness is "all eigenvalues positive," tested by leading principal minors. Half of Putnam linear algebra is recognizing that the matrix in front of you is symmetric and applying the spectral theorem.
"The eigenvalues of are the sums of the eigenvalues of and ." Take and : both have only the eigenvalue , yet has eigenvalues and . Eigenvalues add (and multiply) only when the matrices share eigenvectors — for instance when is a polynomial in , which is why " has eigenvalues " is safe. What does survive for sums is the trace: always ( here).
For , express as .
Show the answerHide the answer
, : . Then , , . The coefficients are Fibonacci numbers — because is the Fibonacci matrix.
Proofs & Why It Matters
If an complex matrix has for all , then every eigenvalue is .
Let the distinct nonzero eigenvalues be with multiplicities . The hypotheses say for (we only need of them): a homogeneous linear system in the unknowns whose coefficient matrix is a Vandermonde matrix in distinct nonzero nodes times — invertible. So all , contradicting unless . Significance: traces of powers determine the spectrum (Newton's identities in matrix clothing); the converse — a nilpotent matrix has all power-traces zero — is immediate from triangularization.
Every square matrix satisfies its own characteristic polynomial: .
Let and let , a matrix whose entries are polynomials in of degree ; write with constant matrices . The adjugate identity holds for every scalar , so comparing coefficients of on both sides gives (with ). Multiply the th equation by on the left and add over : the left side telescopes to , the right side is . (The one-line "substitute into " is NOT a proof — is a scalar there.) Significance: is a combination of , so powers, inverses, and all live in an -dimensional space; that is what makes "compute " tractable. A second route, worth knowing as a technique: for diagonalizable , and is diagonal with entries ; diagonalizable matrices are dense (perturb the eigenvalues apart) and is continuous in the entries, so the identity extends to every complex matrix. Prove an algebraic identity on a dense set, then pass to the limit.
A real symmetric matrix has real eigenvalues and an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors.
Real eigenvalues: if with complex, then , and taking the conjugate transpose of the same scalar (using real) gives ; hence . Orthogonality: for eigenvectors with , , so . Full basis: take a unit eigenvector (it exists since the characteristic polynomial has a real root); maps the orthogonal complement to itself (if then ), and restricted there it is again symmetric; induct on the dimension. Significance: in the eigenbasis, which is the Rayleigh-quotient principle and the reason every quadratic-form extremum on the Putnam is "largest or smallest eigenvalue".
Going Deeper: Worked Problems
Let be a real matrix with . Show .
Step 1 — satisfies , which has distinct roots, so is diagonalizable with eigenvalues in .
Step 2 — in the eigenbasis, is diagonal with entries : it is exactly for the nonzero eigenvalues.
Step 3 — so counts nonzero eigenvalues, which (diagonalizable!) equals the rank. The whole proof is: a polynomial with distinct roots forces diagonalizability, and then everything is a count.
How many matrices over are invertible, and what fraction is that?
Step 1 — columns one at a time: the first is any nonzero vector (), the second avoids the vectors in the span of the first (), the third avoids the in the span of the first two ().
Step 2 — (this group is , the second-smallest nonabelian simple group).
Step 3 — fraction: ; as the fraction of invertible matrices over tends to . A random binary matrix is singular with probability about .
Find the largest and smallest values of on the unit circle , and where they occur.
Step 1 — write with the symmetric (the cross term is split evenly).
Step 2 — eigenvalues: , , so and , with unit eigenvectors and , orthogonal as the spectral theorem promises.
Step 3 — write a unit vector as with . Then , which ranges over .
Step 4 — maximum at , minimum at . Check: ✓.
How to find it. Any extremum of a quadratic form on a sphere is an eigenvalue problem (the Rayleigh quotient); Lagrange's condition is literally .