Determinants the Putnam Way
(the matrix determinant lemma). So for the all-ones matrix .
Proof idea: has rank with the single nonzero eigenvalue (eigenvector ), so has eigenvalues and (repeated). The matrix with on the diagonal and elsewhere is : determinant . Matrices with entries have rank (entries : rank exactly ); entries give rank . Recognize low rank and the determinant is before any computation.
Vandermonde: . Circulant: eigenvalues are the DFT of the first row, . Tridiagonal Toeplitz ( diagonal, off): eigenvalues .
Vandermonde is why points determine a degree- polynomial (the interpolation matrix is invertible iff the are distinct). Circulants are diagonalized by the Fourier matrix, so their determinants are products of polynomial values at roots of unity — how of " on the diagonal, next to it, cyclically" becomes . Tridiagonal determinants satisfy a three-term recurrence , which is why their eigenvalues are cosines.
Before any formula, subtract rows: a determinant whose rows are arithmetic progressions collapses to zero after two subtractions; one whose entries are or becomes triangular after subtracting adjacent rows (, ). The Putnam determinant is almost always a two-row-operations problem in disguise.
What is the rank of the matrix with entries ?
Expand: — a sum of THREE rank-one matrices (, , ), so rank ; and it is exactly (the three are independent for ). Any matrix whose entries are a polynomial in and of total degree has rank at most .
Proofs & Why It Matters
, and more generally for invertible .
Block-matrix proof: the identity holds by direct multiplication; take determinants of both sides (the outer factors are unitriangular, determinant ; the right side is block triangular) to get . For the general form factor . Significance: every "all entries equal except the diagonal" determinant, and every rank-one perturbation, is one line — is the case , .
.
View the determinant as a polynomial in the variables . If two rows coincide and , so divides for every pair; these linear factors are pairwise coprime, so their product divides . Both and have total degree , hence for a constant ; comparing the coefficient of the monomial (the main diagonal term in , and the product of the leading terms in ) gives . Significance: Vandermonde is nonzero iff the nodes are distinct, which is exactly why polynomial interpolation through distinct points is unique — Lagrange interpolation is this determinant's invertibility.
For with on the diagonal and on the off-diagonals, ; the eigenvalues of the symmetric case () are , .
Expand along the first row: the cofactor is ; the entry has a cofactor whose first column contains only (in its first row), and expanding that along its first column leaves . For the eigenvalues, try : the identity shows provided the boundary terms vanish, i.e. , which gives . Significance: with , is the discrete Laplacian; its determinant and its spectrum appear in resistor networks, random walks, and the Putnam every few years.
.
The block identity has determinant on the right and on the left (the outer factors are unit triangular). Significance: with in place of , — the tool behind Sherman–Morrison updates in numerical linear algebra and half the Putnam determinant problems.
.
View the determinant as a polynomial in : it has degree and vanishes whenever for (two equal rows), so it equals with independent of ; comparing the coefficient of (expand along the last row) shows is the Vandermonde. Induct. Significance: the product is nonzero iff the are distinct — polynomial interpolation is unique, and the roots-of-unity Vandermonde is (up to scale) the unitary Fourier matrix.
Going Deeper: Worked Problems
Let be the determinant of the matrix with on the diagonal and on both adjacent diagonals. Find .
Step 1 — expand along the first row: (the second term comes from the in position , whose minor expands to ).
Step 2 — , ; the recurrence has characteristic root (double), so .
Step 3 — fit: , gives .
Step 4 — cross-check with the eigenvalue formula: , a known product identity ✓.
Compute and use it to show three points , , on a parabola are never collinear.
Step 1 — Vandermonde: the determinant is .
Step 2 — three points are collinear iff (the rows are then linearly dependent — the standard area formula).
Step 3 — with that determinant is the Vandermonde, nonzero for distinct . Hence no three distinct points of a parabola are collinear.
Step 4 — the same argument shows a degree- polynomial's graph meets no line in more than points — Vandermonde is the algebraic form of "a polynomial has at most roots."