Analytic and Combinatorial Geometry
Pick: area for a lattice polygon. The segment from to contains lattice points.
A lattice triangle with no lattice points other than its vertices has area exactly ; a lattice polygon with interior and boundary points has area . The gcd fact counts visible points and proves that a lattice line through the origin with irrational slope hits no other lattice point. Minkowski's theorem (a convex symmetric region of area contains a nonzero lattice point) is the Putnam's favorite "existence of a lattice point" tool.
Multiplication rotates and scales; is a distance; the roots of are a regular -gon; reflects.
without expanding. Rotating a point about : . Collinearity of : is real. Triangle is equilateral iff for a primitive cube root of unity . Roots-of-unity sums vanishing is why regular polygons have centroid at the center.
Point-to-line distance ; convex hull arguments; the diameter of a set is attained at extreme points.
Distance from the origin to : . A convex function of a point on a convex polygon is maximized at a vertex. Helly's theorem (if every three of a family of convex sets in the plane meet, all do) and Carathéodory (a point in the convex hull of a set in is a combination of points) are the two named convexity theorems worth knowing.
There are almost no synthetic angle-chase problems. Putnam geometry is about counting (lattice points, regions), extremal configurations (points at maximum distance, minimal enclosing circles), continuous motion arguments (rotate a line until something happens — an IVT in disguise), and coordinates. Bring the analysis and combinatorics toolkits; leave the olympiad geometry lemmas home.
Show that for any bounded region in the plane there is a line that bisects its area AND has a prescribed direction.
Sweep a line of the given direction across the region; the area on the left varies continuously from to the full area, so by the IVT it equals half somewhere. (Rotating the direction and applying IVT again gives the "ham sandwich" for two regions.)
Proofs & Why It Matters
A lattice triangle with no lattice points other than its vertices has area — the base case of Pick.
Such a triangle with edge vectors has area ; the parallelogram spanned by tiles the plane by lattice translates, and it contains exactly lattice points per tile counted appropriately (the index of the sublattice). If the parallelogram — two copies of — contains no lattice points beyond its vertices, that index is , so and the area is . General Pick follows by triangulating into primitive triangles and checking additivity of . Significance: the determinant-as-lattice-index idea is the seed of the geometry of numbers.
Distance from to is .
The normal is perpendicular to the line. Take any point on the line; the distance is the length of the projection of onto the unit normal: , and . Significance: the identical projection argument gives point-to-plane distances in any dimension and the margin of a linear classifier.
Going Deeper: Worked Problems
How many lattice points lie inside or on the circle ?
Step 1 — for each from to , count with : : , points; : , , each; : , each; : , each; : , each; : each.
Step 2 — total .
Step 3 — Gauss's circle problem says the count is : , and is within the error band ✓.
Show that the midpoints of the sides of any quadrilateral form a parallelogram.
Step 1 — vertices as complex numbers; midpoints , , , .
Step 2 — a quadrilateral is a parallelogram iff (opposite sides equal as vectors).
Step 3 — and ✓.
Step 4 — the proof works for skew quadrilaterals in 3D too (replace complex numbers by vectors): Varignon's theorem is really the statement that both midpoint-sides are half the diagonal .