Solving for Functions
Plug in , , , , , ; use the equation to build a second equation, then eliminate.
: substitute and solve the system — . : substitute — . Always VERIFY the candidate in the original equation; the elimination only shows that IF a solution exists it has this form.
has only on (and on under any regularity: continuous, monotone, bounded on an interval). , , reduce to it by logs and exponentials.
On : by induction, then by — so gives . A functional equation with an extra term () is Cauchy after subtracting a particular solution (). Multiplicative equations: when the equation holds for ALL pairs.
Compose the function with itself; find the order. has , so and .
Equations like (involutions), (period ), or (a tangent-addition disguise, period ) are solved by computing a few iterates. Fixed points constrain everything: if and is continuous and increasing then . For recurrences , the fixed points of and the sign of there decide convergence.
If then is injective (compose to cancel) and its range covers a translate of the real line. Showing is injective lets you cancel it on both sides of an equation; showing it is surjective lets you choose an with anything. Half of Putnam functional-equation solutions are one such lemma followed by a substitution.
"From for all we get or , so the solutions are and ." The "or" holds at EACH point separately, and the choice may change from point to point: works, and so does any function with chosen independently at every . Pointwise alternatives do not combine into global ones without an extra hypothesis. With continuity, is a continuous function to on each of and , hence constant on each, and the continuous solutions are exactly , , , .
Find all with .
Show the answerHide the answer
The map has order ; apply it twice more to get three equations in , and solve: . Verify by substitution.
Proofs & Why It Matters
If for all rationals, then with .
gives ; from . Induction gives for positive integers , hence for all integers. For : , so . Significance: extending to needs a regularity hypothesis — continuity at one point, monotonicity, or boundedness on an interval — and without it there are wild solutions (a Hamel basis). A Putnam solution must name which hypothesis it uses.
If is strictly increasing and for all , then .
Suppose for some . Apply the increasing : , i.e. — contradiction. Symmetrically is impossible. Significance: monotonicity plus an involution equation collapses to the identity — the reason problems with always specify "decreasing" or drop monotonicity when they want interesting solutions like or .
Going Deeper: Worked Problems
Let and . Show the sequence converges and find the limit.
Step 1 — fixed points of : gives (the positive root).
Step 2 — monotone and bounded: by induction (since ) and (since iff iff ).
Step 3 — the monotone convergence theorem gives a limit , and continuity of gives , so .
Step 4 — rate: , so the error shrinks by a factor of per step — a contraction, which is the general convergence criterion.
Find all with and .
Step 1 — guess the particular solution from the extra term: satisfies .
Step 2 — set ; then : Cauchy on , so with .
Step 3 — .
Step 4 — verify: ✓, and ✓. Subtracting a particular solution to reach Cauchy is the standard reduction.
Let be differentiable at and satisfy for every . Show that for some constant .
Step 1 — gives , so .
Step 2 — for and every , applying the equation times gives .
Step 3 — as , , and the difference quotient tends to because is differentiable at . The left side does not depend on , so . With , for all , and such clearly work. The hypothesis cannot be dropped: (with ) satisfies , is continuous, and is not linear — it is not differentiable at .
How to find it. The equation relates to ; iterate it in the direction that approaches the one point where a hypothesis is given (here ), and recognize the result as a difference quotient.