The ODE Toolkit the Exam Assumes
Separable: . Linear: is solved by the integrating factor , which makes .
The Putnam never asks you to solve a hard ODE; it asks you to recognize that a functional condition IS an ODE, solve the easy ODE, and then argue about existence, uniqueness, or a bound. with gives — and the point of the problem is the blow-up at : no solution exists on all of . Likewise forces , which cannot be defined on an interval longer than .
If then , so . If and , then is non-increasing, so for (Grönwall).
Multiplying by converts a differential equation into "a derivative is zero" and a differential INEQUALITY into "a function is monotone" — the two-line arguments graders want in place of "obviously the solution is ". For second-order equations the analogous tool is an energy: for , has , so a solution with has and is identically zero — uniqueness for free.
has solutions for the roots of (with for a double root, and , for ).
The solution space is two-dimensional (a solution is determined by — that is the uniqueness theorem), so two independent solutions span everything. The same characteristic-root method solves linear recurrences, which is why the "Sequences" and "Differential Equations" units share a proof.
Typical asks: show a function satisfying an -type condition has a specific form; bound given ; show a solution of cannot exist on all of (compare with after some point and use blow-up); compute for the unique with , . Existence and uniqueness (Picard) may be cited; blow-up must be argued.
Solve with and evaluate .
: , so , , and .
Proofs & Why It Matters
If on with , then .
Let . Then , so is non-increasing and , i.e. . Significance: Grönwall is how uniqueness of ODE solutions is actually proved (apply it to the square of the difference of two solutions), and it is the model for every "differential inequality growth bound" argument.
If is differentiable with and , then cannot exist on .
Since , is non-decreasing, so wherever it exists and . Integrating from to : , i.e. , which is impossible once (the left side is positive). Significance: this comparison is the standard way to show that solutions of have finite lifetime — a favorite Putnam "prove that no such function exists on all of ."
Formulas, Proofs & Tips
What it means. Get all the 's on one side and all the 's on the other, then integrate both sides.
Example. : .
Why it works. Dividing by and multiplying by separates the variables; integrating both sides is valid because each side is the derivative of the same quantity with respect to (a chain-rule substitution in reverse).
Tip. Apply the initial condition to find before simplifying — it is usually much less algebra.