The Definitions the Putnam Assumes
A group is a set with an associative operation, an identity, and inverses. The ORDER of an element is the least with ; Lagrange: the order of a subgroup (hence of any element) divides the order of the group.
In (addition mod ) the element has order : has order . Cyclic groups of order have exactly one subgroup per divisor of ( has subgroups) and exactly elements of order ( has of order ). Consequences of Lagrange: a group of prime order is cyclic; for all — which IS Fermat–Euler when .
Symmetric groups (permutations, cycle structure, parity), matrix groups , units mod , dihedral groups, and "the set of all maps satisfying …" that turns out to be a group.
A permutation's order is the lcm of its cycle lengths — a Putnam question asks for the maximum order in (Landau's function) or the number of elements of a given order. Any finite subset of a group closed under the operation is a subgroup (finite cancellation forces inverses). If every element satisfies the group is abelian. These small lemmas are quotable and graders expect them.
A field has division by nonzero elements; and its extensions are the finite ones. A polynomial of degree over a FIELD has at most roots.
Over with composite that fails ( has four roots mod ) — the root-count bound is a FIELD property. Wilson's theorem is "pair each element with its inverse"; in is the same fact as a polynomial identity. Frobenius is a ring homomorphism in characteristic : .
Definitions, Lagrange, cyclic-group facts, and comfort with and matrix groups. Sylow theorems and classification results almost never appear; when a problem says "group," the intended solution usually uses only closure, associativity, and counting.
Show that in any group of order , an element of order and an element of order commute if their product has order ... simpler: how many elements of order does have?
— the generators . (And indeed every group of order is cyclic, by a Sylow argument you will not need on the exam.)
Proofs & Why It Matters
For a subgroup of a finite group , divides .
The left cosets partition : two cosets either coincide or are disjoint (if then , forcing ), and every element lies in its own coset. Each coset has exactly elements (the map is a bijection ). So . Significance: Fermat's little theorem, Euler's theorem, and "a group of prime order is cyclic" are all corollaries — Lagrange is the one group-theory proof every Putnam competitor should be able to write from memory.
The property that separates fields from rings like .
If , divide: with (polynomial division needs only that the leading coefficient of is invertible). Any other root satisfies , and in a FIELD is invertible, so . Induct on the degree. Over , can be a zero divisor (), and has the four roots . Significance: this is why is cyclic and why Lagrange interpolation works — uniqueness of polynomials from values is a field theorem.
Going Deeper: Worked Problems
What is the largest possible order of an element of ?
Step 1 — the order of a permutation is the lcm of its cycle lengths, which sum to at most .
Step 2 — maximize subject to the sum: try , lcm ; , lcm ; , lcm ; ? sum , lcm ; wins.
Step 3 — the maximum is (Landau's function ).
Step 4 — the same reasoning gives the number of elements of order in (products of disjoint transpositions) and answers every "orders in " Putnam question: it is a partition problem in disguise.
Let be a group and a nonempty FINITE subset closed under the group operation. Show is a subgroup.
Step 1 — take ; the powers all lie in (closure) and is finite, so for some , whence : the identity is in .
Step 2 — with , is in (it is if , otherwise a positive power) and : the inverse of lies in .
Step 3 — closure, identity, inverses: a subgroup. Finiteness converted "closed under multiplication" into "closed under inverses" — infinite counterexample: the positive integers inside .