The Idea of a Limit; Estimating Numerically and Graphically
The limit of as approaches is the single value that the outputs get arbitrarily close to as gets close to (from both sides), without necessarily equaling . We write
The value itself may be different from , or may not even exist—the limit only cares about the behavior near .
A limit is a prediction from the neighbours: it asks what value is heading toward as closes in on , and ignores what happens exactly at . That is why a function with a hole, or with a stray value at , can still have a perfectly good limit there, and why the limit is the right tool for the situations that the derivative produces.
Estimate . The function is undefined at (it gives ), so we build a table of nearby inputs:
From both sides the outputs approach , so , even though is undefined.
Declaring a limit "does not exist" whenever substitution gives . That form is indeterminate, not undefined — it means more work, and usually a finite answer.
Tip: A hole in a graph does not stop a limit from existing. Read a limit by tracing the curve toward with your finger—the height you approach is , whether or not the point is filled in.
Estimate from the values at and .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: . At the quotient is ; at it is . (The quotient simplifies to away from .) Both sides close in on .
Evaluating Limits Algebraically
If and both exist, then limits distribute over the arithmetic:
Direct substitution: for any polynomial, and for any rational/radical function where the denominator is nonzero and the radicand is valid, .
The laws say that limits respect arithmetic: if heads to and heads to , then heads to , and so on, as long as nothing divides by zero. So for polynomials and other continuous functions the limit is just the value. Only when substitution produces is there real work, and then the aim is always to rewrite the expression so the offending factor cancels.
Evaluate .
Direct substitution gives (indeterminate), so we factor and cancel:
Now substitute: .
Evaluate . Substitution gives . Multiply by the conjugate:
Then
Tip: Always try direct substitution first. Only if it produces the indeterminate form do you switch tools: factor and cancel (for polynomial ratios) or multiply by the conjugate (when a square root is involved).
Evaluate .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: . Substitution gives . Factor: for , and .
One-Sided Limits; When a Limit Fails; Infinite Limits
The right-hand limit uses inputs slightly larger than ; the left-hand limit uses inputs slightly smaller. The two-sided limit exists only when they agree:
A limit fails to exist (DNE) when: the one-sided limits differ (a jump), the function grows without bound (infinite), or the function oscillates wildly near .
For the function graphed here, but . Since the one-sided limits disagree, does not exist. (Note from the closed dot—but that has no bearing on the two-sided limit.)
If increases or decreases without bound as , we write (or ). This is a way of describing a limit that fails to exist; the line is a vertical asymptote. For :
Tip: To find a vertical asymptote of a rational function, look for inputs that make the denominator zero but the numerator nonzero after all common factors are cancelled. A factor that cancels gives a hole, not an asymptote.
For , find , , and decide whether exists.
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: , ; the two-sided limit does not exist. For , , so ; for , . The one-sided limits disagree.
Limits at Infinity and End Behavior
means the outputs level off at the height as grows large; the line is a horizontal asymptote. Two building blocks:
Rational functions —compare degrees:
- degree top degree bottom limit (H.A. );
- degree top degree bottom limit ratio of leading coefficients;
- degree top degree bottom limit (no H.A.).
Evaluate . Divide numerator and denominator by the highest power, :
The degrees match, so the limit is the ratio of leading coefficients, . The line is a horizontal asymptote.
Tip: For polynomials, end behavior is governed entirely by the leading term: behaves like . Lower-degree terms are negligible for large .
Evaluate and .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: and . Divide by the highest power in the denominator. In the first the degrees match, leaving . In the second, dividing by gives .
Continuity at a Point; Types of Discontinuity
A function is continuous at if all three hold:
Informally: you can draw the graph through without lifting your pencil. If any part fails, has a discontinuity there.
Continuity at means the graph can be drawn through without lifting the pencil, which is exactly the statement that the value the function is heading toward equals the value it takes: . The three parts of the test just check, in order, that both sides of that equation exist and then that they agree.
- Removable (a hole): exists but (or is undefined). “Removable” because redefining one point would fix it.
- Jump: the left- and right-hand limits both exist but disagree.
- Infinite: the function blows up to (a vertical asymptote).
Left to right: a removable discontinuity (a hole), a jump, and an infinite discontinuity (a vertical asymptote).
Is continuous at ? Here is undefined, so part (1) fails— is discontinuous at . Because exists, the discontinuity is removable: defining would patch the hole.
Tip: To classify a discontinuity from an equation, factor the rational expression. A factor that cancels signals a removable hole; a leftover zero in the denominator signals an infinite discontinuity (vertical asymptote).
Where is discontinuous, what kind of discontinuity is it, and what value of would remove it?
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: at ; removable; define . is undefined at , but , so the limit exists and only a single point is missing.
The Tangent-Line Problem, the Derivative, and the Area Problem
The slope of the secant line through and is the difference quotient . Letting slides the second point into the first; the secant slopes approach the slope of the tangent line. That limiting slope is the derivative:
A tangent line touches the curve at one point, so its slope cannot be computed from two points on it. The way around is to compute slopes of secants through and a nearby point , which we can do, and then let . The difference quotient is that secant slope, and its limit is the tangent slope.
Find for .
Then
So the tangent slope at is .
The other great problem of calculus is finding the area under a curve over . Approximate it with thin rectangles of width , sum their areas, and take a limit:
As the rectangles shrink and the approximation becomes exact. This limit is the definite integral.
Tip: Both headline ideas of calculus are limits: the derivative is a limit of secant slopes (), and the definite integral is a limit of rectangle-sum areas (). Mastering limits now is what makes calculus possible later.
Use the limit definition to find for , and the slope of the tangent at .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: ; slope at . . At : .
Going Deeper: Advanced Limit Ideas
When direct substitution gives , the expression hides a common factor you must expose and cancel. Choose the tool by what you see:
- Polynomial ratio factor top and bottom, cancel the shared factor.
- A square root multiply by the conjugate to turn differences into plain differences.
- A complex fraction (fractions stacked inside a fraction) combine the small fractions over a common denominator first, then simplify the big fraction.
- A trig ratio rewrite in terms of and and steer toward the small-angle facts and .
Evaluate . Substitution gives . First combine the top over the common denominator :
Dividing by means multiplying by , and the 's cancel:
Substitution gives . Rewrite and factor out of the numerator:
Now split the in the denominator as and group into three familiar pieces:
Each factor has a known limit as , so the product is .
The floor is the greatest integer ; its graph is a staircase of flat steps with jumps at every integer. So at an integer the one-sided limits disagree:
Between integers the floor is constant, so for any non-integer , (continuous there).
Suppose a piecewise has two unknown constants and you want it smooth (continuous and differentiable) at the split point . You get two equations from two conditions:
Match the heights for continuity and the slopes for differentiability, then solve the resulting system for and .
Find so that
is differentiable at .
Slopes (differentiability). For , ; for , . Matching slopes gives .
Heights (continuity). The left value is ; the right value is . Matching gives , so .
Thus : the parabola hands off to the tangent line with no corner.
Find for . Form the difference quotient and combine the small fractions:
The cancels, so
Evaluate . This is an form, so multiply by the conjugate:
Divide top and bottom by (and, since , note ):
Preview—area as a limit of Riemann sums. To find the exact area under on , cut it into rectangles of width using right endpoints :
As this tends to , so the area is . Every definite integral is exactly this kind of limit.
Evaluate .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: . Multiply by the conjugate: .
Why It Works
Why can you cancel in when is zero at ? Because the limit only asks about NEAR , never at , and for every such the factor is nonzero and cancels legitimately. The functions and agree everywhere except at the single point , and a limit cannot see a single point.
Do not read a proof the way you read a rule. Cover the last line, ask what the previous line forces, and only then uncover it. If a step feels like magic, that is the step to work by hand with a concrete number.
Formulas, Proofs & Tips
What it means. The slope of the tangent line — the instantaneous rate of change.
Example. For : .
Why it works. is the slope of the secant through two nearby points. Letting slides the second point into the first, so the secant becomes the tangent.
Tip. The must cancel before you substitute ; otherwise you get the meaningless .
What it means. If a limit gives the indeterminate form or , differentiate the top and bottom separately and try again.
Why it works. Near both functions are approximated by their tangent lines, and . The common factor cancels in the ratio, leaving .
Tip. Check the form FIRST — applying it to a limit that isn't indeterminate gives a wrong answer. It is not the quotient rule: do not differentiate as a whole.
What it means. If a function is trapped between two others that meet at , it must go to too.
Example. Since and both bounds , the limit at is .
Why it works. Beyond some point never leaves the gap between and . As that gap closes to zero width around , has nowhere else to go.
Tip. The classic use is , squeezed by and .