The General Machinery
For solutions of the same second-order linear homogeneous equation, the Wronskian is either never zero or identically zero (Abel's theorem: ).
Why this determinant: to match arbitrary data , with , you must solve and — a linear system whose determinant is . Nonzero means is a fundamental set — every solution is a combination of them, and every initial-value problem is solvable within their span. Computing is a determinant: for it is the constant .
For with fundamental pair : seek with functions . Imposing the standard side condition leads to , — two integrations and done.
Unlike undetermined coefficients this needs no guess and works for any continuous forcing: , , . The cost is two possibly-ugly integrals; the gain is universality. The side condition is a choice, not a law: two unknown functions leave room for two conditions, and this one keeps out of , so that contains only first derivatives of the and the equation becomes a linear system for and .
Step 1 — fundamental pair: , , .
Step 2 — the formulas: and .
Step 3 — integrate: , .
Step 4 — assemble: .
Step 5 — sanity: the piece echoes resonance ( contains the natural frequency), and differentiating twice confirms ✓.
Step 6 — where it lives: is continuous only on (there , so makes sense), and on that interval and : this is the response of the system started from rest.
Wronskians appear wherever independence of functions matters: quantum mechanics uses them to normalize scattering states, and numerical ODE solvers monitor them to detect degenerating solution bases. Variation of parameters, meanwhile, is the finite-dimensional ancestor of the "Green's function" method that solves PDEs by superposing impulse responses.
Compute and decide whether the pair is a fundamental set for .
Show the answerHide the answer
With and : and . So . It is never zero, so the two solutions are independent and form a fundamental set: every solution is . Abel's formula agrees: gives .
Variation of Parameters, Worked in Full
With a fundamental pair for and ,
where is the right side after dividing the equation by the coefficient of . Constants of integration may be dropped: they only add , which the homogeneous part already contains.
The formula is Cramer's rule for the two conditions on : the side condition and the equation's requirement . The coefficient matrix has determinant , never zero for a fundamental pair, so the system always has a solution — that is why the method cannot fail when is continuous. The must come from the equation with leading coefficient , because the derivation substitutes into .
Find for by variation of parameters, and compare with undetermined coefficients.
Step 1 — , , and .
Step 2 — and .
Step 3 — integrate: and .
Step 4 — .
Step 5 — compare: guessing a constant gives , so , the same answer. The machinery is heavier than needed here, but it produces exactly what guessing produces whenever guessing works.
Step 6 — from rest, forces , : , which oscillates between and about .
Solve on .
Step 1 — , , .
Step 2 — , using to split the fraction into integrable pieces; and .
Step 3 — integrate: and .
Step 4 — assemble: .
Step 5 — the general solution is . Undetermined coefficients could not have found this: has infinitely many independent derivatives, so there is no finite family to guess from.
Solve for , given that and solve the homogeneous equation.
Step 1 — check the pair: for , ✓; for , ✓. Their Wronskian is .
Step 2 — standard form: dividing by gives , so .
Step 3 — and .
Step 4 — and , so .
Step 5 — verify in the original equation: ✓. The general solution is .
In the last example, using (the right side as printed) instead of gives and , so . Substituting: , not . The formula solved a different equation, off by exactly the leading coefficient .
Find a particular solution of .
Show the answerHide the answer
Homogeneous: , so and , with (the Try-it above, with in place of ). Then and . Integrate: and . So .
Abel's Formula and Reduction of Order
If solves , a second, independent solution is
Abel's formula gives from alone, before any second solution is known.
By the quotient rule, . Abel's theorem says for any pair of solutions, so choosing and integrating once recovers the ratio , hence . Because , the ratio is not constant, so really is independent of .
The equation on has the solutions and . Predict their Wronskian from Abel's formula, then check it.
Step 1 — standard form: , so and .
Step 2 — direct computation: .
Step 3 — this has Abel's shape with , and it is never zero for , so and form a fundamental set.
Given that solves on , find a second solution.
Step 1 — check: ✓.
Step 2 — standard form gives , so .
Step 3 — .
Step 4 — verify: and , so ✓. The indicial equation has a double root, and plays the role that the extra factor plays for constant coefficients.
The functions and have at every (for they coincide; for , ), yet no single constant gives on the whole line, so they are independent. This does not contradict Abel's all-or-nothing theorem, which is about two solutions of one equation with continuous ; no such equation on an interval containing has both of these as solutions. Only for solutions does settle dependence.
Check that solves on , and find a second solution.
Show the answerHide the answer
Check: ✓. Standard form: , so and . Then . Any nonzero multiple is also a solution, so take . Check: ✓.
Proofs & Why It Matters
With and side condition : then , and . Substitute into the ODE; the -times-homogeneous-solution terms vanish (each solves the homogeneous equation), leaving .
Together with the side condition this is a linear system in whose determinant is exactly ; Cramer's rule gives , .
Differentiate : (the cross terms cancel). Substitute : . So — never zero unless , in which case it vanishes identically. Independence is an all-or-nothing affair.
Going Deeper: Worked Problems
Solve for .
Step 1 — homogeneous: , double root: , .
Step 2 — Wronskian: .
Step 3 — the formulas with : , and .
Step 4 — integrate: , .
Step 5 — ; the is a homogeneous solution and can be dropped: . General solution: . Undetermined coefficients has no guess for — this method never needed one.
Are and a fundamental set of solutions of on ?
Step 1 — check each solves the equation: for : ✓; for : , , so ✓.
Step 2 — Wronskian: , nonzero for .
Step 3 — conclusion: yes — independent solutions, so every solution is .
Step 4 — connect: this is a Cauchy–Euler equation with double indicial root , and the companion is the shadow of the rule. The Wronskian being exactly matches Abel's formula with .