-Substitution Review
If you can write an integrand in the form , let so that . The integral becomes . Look for an “inside” function whose derivative also appears (up to a constant factor). For a definite integral, either change the limits to -values or convert back to before substituting the original limits.
Substitution reverses the chain rule, integration by parts reverses the product rule, partial fractions split rational functions into pieces that integrate to logs and arctangents, and trigonometric substitutions remove square roots of quadratics. Improper integrals are limits of ordinary ones. The skill is recognizing which reversal fits.
Trickier substitutions to watch for: when only part of gets absorbed, you may need to solve for the leftover. For , let , so and .
Changing variables in a definite integral without changing the limits, or back-substituting and then using the old limits. Pick one: convert the limits, or return to — not both.
Tip: After substituting, every and must disappear. If an is left over, solve the -equation for and substitute it in — don't guess.
Work it on paper before revealing the answer.
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer:
Integration by Parts
Integration by parts reverses the product rule:
Choose to be the factor that gets simpler when differentiated. The LIATE order tells you which factor to call (earlier = better choice for ):
Whatever is left (together with ) becomes .
Integrate both sides of the product rule and rearrange: . The formula trades one integral for another, so it helps only when is simpler, which is what LIATE is for: choose as the factor that becomes simpler when differentiated.
Evaluate . By LIATE, Algebraic beats Exponential, so , .
Check: ✓
Repeated parts & the tabular method. When is a polynomial, you apply parts once per degree. The tabular method organizes this: differentiate down to in one column, antidifferentiate in the other, and multiply along the diagonals with alternating signs
Multiply along diagonals with the signs:
Cyclic parts. For neither factor simplifies, but applying parts twice reproduces the original integral, which you solve for algebraically.
Let . Take : Apply parts again to with :
Tip: For and there is no obvious — take (so ) and let be the whole function. Result: .
Find .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: . Logarithm comes first in LIATE, so , ; then and . The new integral is .
Rational Functions by Partial Fractions
To integrate with : factor , then write the fraction as a sum of simpler pieces.
- Each distinct linear factor contributes .
- A repeated linear factor contributes .
If , do polynomial long division first. Clear denominators, then solve for the constants (plug in convenient -values or match coefficients).
Evaluate . Factor: .
Let : . Let : . So
Matching : Then
Tip: Always check that the fraction is proper () before decomposing. Otherwise divide first — the quotient integrates as a polynomial and the remainder gets the partial fractions.
Find .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: . (cover-up at and ); integrate each term to a logarithm.
Trigonometric Integrals
For :
- If a power is odd, peel off one factor and convert the rest with , then substitute.
- If both powers are even, use the power-reduction identities @@BLOCK0@@
Tip: The double-angle identity lets you rewrite instantly.
Find .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: . Odd power: save one and convert the rest, . With this is .
Trigonometric Substitution (a first look)
When a root of a quadratic appears, trade for a trig function so the Pythagorean identity collapses the root:
After substituting, integrate in , then use a right triangle to convert back to .
Then and , so
Tip: Many and integrals are faster with the standard arcsin/arctan formulas. Reach for a full trig sub when the root is multiplied by other powers of .
Evaluate with .
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer: . , , and the limits become to : . It is a quarter of a circle of radius .
Improper Integrals
An integral is improper if a limit of integration is infinite, or if the integrand blows up somewhere on the interval. Handle it by replacing the bad endpoint with a limit:
If the limit is a finite number, the integral converges; if it is or does not exist, it diverges. Split an integral with two trouble spots into two pieces — both must converge.
An integral over an infinite interval (or through a blow-up) is not a Riemann sum, so we define it as the limit of honest integrals over longer and longer intervals. Whether that limit is finite depends on how fast the integrand dies: shrinks fast enough that the added pieces total a finite amount, while shrinks too slowly.
as , so
-integral test: converges ; converges .
Decide convergence and evaluate if possible: (a) ; (b) .
Show the answerHide the answer
(a) Converges to : . (b) Diverges: (a -integral with ).
Going Deeper: Advanced Techniques
Repeated integration by parts produces a formula that lowers a power by a fixed step. For example,
Apply it repeatedly until you reach or . The same pattern gives reduction formulas for , , , and .
For , two applications of parts give
The denominator is the fingerprint of a cyclic “solve-for-” problem.
An irreducible factor contributes a linear numerator . Evaluate:
Matching: , and . So
using and .
If for all , then:
Use it when an antiderivative is hard to find but the integrand is squeezed by a -integral.
Does converge? For , , so . Since converges (a -integral with ), the smaller integral converges by comparison.
Evaluate with , , :
reading off the reference triangle.
When a quadratic has no rational roots, complete the square to expose a standard form. For , write , then let :
Big picture: Before integrating, run a quick checklist — (1) does a simple -sub work? (2) is it a product suited to parts? (3) is it a rational function (partial fractions)? (4) powers of trig? (5) a root of a quadratic (trig sub / complete the square)? Matching the form to the method is the whole game.
Work it on paper before revealing the answer.
Show the answerHide the answer
Answer:
Why It Works
Integration by parts is the product rule integrated: , so . Substitution is the chain rule integrated: since , we get . Every integration technique is a differentiation rule read from right to left — which is why differentiating your answer is always a complete check.
Do not read a proof the way you read a rule. Cover the last line, ask what the previous line forces, and only then uncover it. If a step feels like magic, that is the step to work by hand with a concrete number.
Formulas, Proofs & Tips
What it means. Substitution reverses the chain rule; parts reverses the product rule.
Example. (let , ).
Why it works. With , , so the integral literally rewrites in . For parts, integrate the product rule across the interval and rearrange.
Tip. When substituting in a definite integral, convert the limits to as well — then you never convert back.