Simplifying Rational Expressions & Domain
A rational expression is a ratio of two polynomials, . It is undefined wherever the denominator equals zero — those inputs are the excluded values. The domain is every real number except the excluded values.
To simplify: factor the numerator and denominator completely, then cancel any common factors. Always list excluded values from the original denominator.
Rational functions have vertical asymptotes where the denominator is zero (after cancelling) and horizontal asymptotes decided by comparing degrees. Holes appear where a factor cancels. Solving rational equations means multiplying by the LCD — then checking that no candidate makes a denominator zero.
Cancelling a common factor multiplies by , which is true everywhere except , where it is . So the simplified form matches the original at every input but that one. On the graph the difference is a single missing point, a hole, while the factor that does not cancel, , produces a vertical asymptote.
Simplify and state the domain.
Excluded values come from the original denominator , so and . Domain: all reals except and .
Accepting a solution that makes the original denominator zero. Multiplying by the LCD can introduce it; it is not a solution, it is a hole.
Cancel factors, never terms. You may cancel because is a factor. You may not cancel the 's in — those are terms joined by , not factors.
Simplify and state the domain.
Show the answerHide the answer
Factor: . The original denominator is zero at , so the domain is all reals except and .
Multiplying & Dividing
Multiply: factor everything, cancel any factor in a numerator against a matching factor in a denominator, then write what remains.
Divide: multiply by the reciprocal of the second fraction — “keep, change, flip” — then proceed as a multiplication.
Multiplying rational expressions multiplies all the factors into one fraction, so a factor on any top may cancel a factor on any bottom. Dividing flips the divisor because division undoes multiplication; the flip also moves the divisor's numerator into a denominator, adding its zeros to the excluded values.
Simplify .
Cancelling before factoring: in , "cancelling" the s to get . Factor first: .
Simplify .
Simplify .
Show the answerHide the answer
Flip and factor: , for .
Adding & Subtracting (LCD)
You can only combine fractions over a common denominator. Find the LCD: factor each denominator, then take each distinct factor to its highest power that appears. Rewrite each fraction with the LCD, combine the numerators, then simplify.
Rewriting over the LCD multiplies each fraction by a form of , so values stay the same while the pieces become the same size. The subtraction trap comes from the distributive property: subtracting a numerator subtracts every term of it.
Simplify . The LCD is .
Subtracting only the first term: with numerator . The whole numerator is subtracted: .
Simplify . The LCD is .
Subtraction trap. The minus sign applies to the entire numerator of the second fraction. Wrap it in parentheses first: , not .
Simplify .
Show the answerHide the answer
LCD : , .
Complex Fractions
A complex fraction has fractions in its numerator, denominator, or both. The fastest method: find the LCD of all the little fractions and multiply the top and bottom by that LCD. This clears every small denominator at once.
Multiplying top and bottom by the same nonzero expression multiplies by , so it cannot change the value. Choosing the LCD of every small fraction makes all the small denominators cancel in one step.
Simplify . The LCD of and is .
Multiplying only the fractional terms by the LCD: in , turning the top into . Every term is multiplied, including the s: over .
Simplify .
Show the answerHide the answer
Multiply top and bottom by : , for .
Solving Rational Equations & Extraneous Solutions
To solve (not simplify) a rational equation, multiply every term by the LCD to clear all fractions, then solve the resulting polynomial equation. Because multiplying by a variable expression can introduce false roots, you must check each answer.
Multiplying both sides by an expression that can be zero is not reversible: at , multiplying by turns two undefined sides into . That is how an excluded value can appear as a "solution," and why every answer must be checked against the original denominators.
Extraneous solutions. Any answer that makes an original denominator zero is extraneous — discard it. Always list the excluded values before you start, then reject any solution that lands on one.
Solve . Excluded: .
But is excluded, so it is extraneous. No solution.
Keeping an answer that makes a denominator zero. In the first example the algebra returns , but both fractions are undefined there, so there is no solution.
Solve . Excluded: .
Neither is excluded, so both check: .
Solve .
Show the answerHide the answer
Exclude . Multiply by : , so and . But is excluded, so there is no solution.
Graphing Rational Functions
For in lowest terms:
- Holes: a factor that cancels from top and bottom gives a hole at that -value.
- Vertical asymptotes (VA): set the remaining denominator equal to .
- Horizontal asymptote (HA): compare degrees of and .
- Intercepts: -intercepts where ; -intercept at .
Near the denominator of is tiny while the numerator is near , so the quotient is huge, positive on one side and negative on the other: a vertical asymptote. For large both top and bottom are dominated by their terms, so the quotient approaches : the horizontal asymptote. Degrees decide horizontal asymptotes for exactly this reason.
How to find the HA. Let , .
- : HA is (the -axis).
- : HA is .
- : no HA (there is a slant/oblique asymptote instead).
Analyze .
- Domain / VA: denominator VA at ; domain .
- HA: degrees equal (), so .
- -intercept: .
- -intercept: .
- Holes: no common factor, so none.
Putting a vertical asymptote at every zero of the original denominator. In the factor cancels, leaving a hole at , not an asymptote. Simplify first, then read asymptotes from what is left.
Analyze , with . The factor cancels, so instead of a vertical asymptote there is a hole at . Its height is 's reduced form at : , so the hole is at . The graph is the line with a single point punched out.
Find the vertical and horizontal asymptotes, the intercepts and any hole of .
Show the answerHide the answer
Factor: , . Hole at , height : . Vertical asymptote . Degrees equal, so the horizontal asymptote is . The only intercept is .
Direct, Inverse & Joint Variation
Every variation problem hides a constant . Use one data point to find , then answer the question.
- Direct: (as grows, grows proportionally).
- Inverse: (as grows, shrinks).
- Joint: ( varies with the product of two quantities).
Each model says one expression is constant: (direct), (inverse), (joint). One data point fixes the constant, and the constant then answers every other question. For inverse variation, doubling halves because their product must stay .
varies inversely with , and when . Find when .
Treating inverse variation as "subtract": from at , guessing at because went up . Inverse variation keeps the product constant: gives .
varies jointly with and , and when and . Find when and .
Show the answerHide the answer
: , so . Then .
Applications: Work/Rate & Mixture
If one worker finishes a job in hours, their rate is job per hour. When several work together, rates add. For a shared time :
For mixture problems, track the amount of pure substance and set the concentration equal to your target.
Rates add because in each hour each pipe contributes its own fraction of the job: of the tank per hour. Times do not add, because a second pipe shortens the job rather than lengthening it. In a dilution the amount of pure acid never changes; only the total volume does, which is what the equation tracks.
Pipe A fills a tank in hours, pipe B in hours. How long together?
Averaging the times: two pipes taking and hours "take hours together." That is slower than the -hour pipe alone. Adding rates gives hours.
How much water must be added to L of acid to weaken it to ? The pure acid stays at L. Let liters of water added:
Sanity check. A “together” time must be shorter than either worker alone. If your answer is longer than the fastest worker, recheck the setup.
How many liters of pure acid must be added to L of a solution to make a solution?
Show the answerHide the answer
Acid now: L. Adding L of pure acid: , so and , L. Check: .
Going Deeper: Advanced Rational Functions
Both come from a zero of the original denominator, but they behave very differently. Factor top and bottom completely and compare the multiplicity of each root:
- Vertical asymptote at : the factor survives in the denominator of the reduced form. The function blows up () there.
- Hole at : the factor cancels completely. If it appears to power on top and on the bottom, the outcome depends on which is larger.
Compare powers: with on top and on the bottom, the net factor is . If the point is a hole (removable); if it is a vertical asymptote of order .
Analyze near .
Since , one factor of remains below: there is a vertical asymptote at , not a hole. Had the top been instead, all three would cancel and would be a hole.
When (numerator exactly one degree higher), there is no horizontal asymptote — instead the graph follows a slant line . Find it by polynomial long division:
As the remainder term , so the curve hugs the line . The remainder is what you discard for the asymptote — but its sign tells you whether the curve sits above or below the line.
Find the slant asymptote of .
The slant asymptote is . Because the remainder for , the curve lies above the line to the right and below it to the left. (Degrees: , confirming a slant, not horizontal, asymptote.)
When does a graph cross its horizontal asymptote? A horizontal asymptote only describes end behavior (); it may be crossed in the middle. Set (the HA value) and solve. If there is a real solution, the graph crosses its HA there. A graph can never cross a vertical asymptote, but crossing a horizontal or slant asymptote is perfectly legal.
Does cross its horizontal asymptote? Degrees are equal, so . Set :
Yes — the graph crosses at . Beyond that point it approaches without touching it again.
The reverse of adding fractions: split one complicated rational expression into a sum of simple ones. First make sure the fraction is proper (); if not, divide first. Then factor and assign an unknown numerator to each factor type:
- Distinct linear : term .
- Repeated linear : one term per power, .
- Irreducible quadratic : term (a linear numerator).
Clear denominators and solve for the constants — either by substituting convenient -values or by matching coefficients.
Decompose . Write and clear denominators:
So . (This is exactly the “add” example from Section 3, run backwards.)
Decompose . Set up every required term:
Clearing denominators gives .
Solving the system yields , so
Note the repeated factor gets two terms and the quadratic gets a linear numerator .
Partial fractions turn many “impossible” sums into telescoping sums, where adjacent terms cancel in a cascade. The key identity is
Summing it, every interior term is cancelled by its neighbour, leaving only the first and last:
Evaluate . Decompose the general term, then collapse:
The whole sum reduces to just the surviving endpoints — no other arithmetic needed.
Many problems become easy once you let . Squaring and cubing generate the other symmetric powers:
So knowing a single value instantly gives and without ever solving for .
If , find . Let and use the identities:
Answer: . (Check via .)
A continued fraction nests division inside division:
Evaluate a finite one by working from the bottom up. A periodic infinite continued fraction satisfies a self-referential equation: if equals the whole expression and the pattern repeats, substitute back into itself and solve the resulting (usually quadratic) equation — keeping the positive root.
Evaluate , which repeats forever. Because the tail below the first bar is an identical copy of :
We take the positive root, so , the golden ratio .
Why It Works
As , a rational function behaves like the ratio of its leading terms, because lower powers become negligible in comparison. If the degrees match, the ratio tends to the ratio of leading coefficients (a horizontal asymptote); if the numerator's degree is smaller, it tends to ; if larger, it grows without bound (possibly along a slant asymptote found by long division). Near a zero of the denominator the values blow up because you are dividing by something tiny — hence the vertical asymptote.
Do not read a proof the way you read a rule. Cover the last line, ask what the previous line forces, and only then uncover it. If a step feels like magic, that is the step to work by hand with a concrete number.
Formulas, Proofs & Tips
What it means. A rational expression exists everywhere except where its denominator vanishes.
Example. is undefined at , so .
Why it works. Division asks "what times the denominator gives the numerator?". If the denominator is , no number works (or every number does, when the numerator is too), so the value cannot be defined.
Tip. Find the excluded values from the original denominator, before cancelling. Cancelling can hide a restriction that still applies.