Equations, Inequalities & Absolute Value

Study Sheet

Equations, Inequalities & Absolute Value

Everything for Topic 1 on one desk reference

Solving Multi-Step Linear Equations

Concept
The Big Idea: Keep it Balanced

An equation is a balance scale. Whatever you do to one side, you must do to the other. Your goal is to isolate the variable. A reliable order of moves:

  • Clear parentheses by distributing.
  • Clear fractions by multiplying every term by the LCD.
  • Collect the variable terms on one side, constants on the other.
  • Combine like terms, then divide by the coefficient.

Every step should leave the equation equivalent (same solution set).

Absolute-value equations split into two cases, because ∣u∣=5|u| = 5 means u=5u = 5 or u=−5u = -5. Absolute-value inequalities become compound inequalities: ∣u∣<5|u| < 5 is −5<u<5-5 < u < 5, while ∣u∣>5|u| > 5 is u<−5u < -5 or u>5u > 5. Isolate the absolute value first, then split.

Each move (distribute, clear fractions, collect, divide) replaces the equation with one that has exactly the same solutions, because each move can be undone. That is the only thing solving has to guarantee. The graph gives an independent picture: the two sides are two lines, and the solution is the xx where they meet.

Example
Worked Example: Variables on Both Sides
xy−9−8−7−6−5−4−3−2−1−40−30−20−10(−7, −33)
The two sides 3(x−4)3(x - 4) and 5x+25x + 2 as lines: they meet at x=−7x = -7.

Solve 3(x−4)=5x+23(x-4) = 5x + 2.

3x−12=5x+2distribute−12−2=5x−3xgather x on the right, constants on the left−14=2xx=−7divide by 2\begin{aligned} 3x - 12 &= 5x + 2 &&\text{distribute}\\ -12 - 2 &= 5x - 3x &&\text{gather $x$ on the right, constants on the left}\\ -14 &= 2x\\ x &= -7 &&\text{divide by 2} \end{aligned}

Check: 3(−7−4)=3(−11)=−333(-7-4) = 3(-11) = -33 and 5(−7)+2=−335(-7)+2 = -33. ✓

Side note
Where it goes wrong

Multiplying only the fraction terms by the LCD: x2+x−13=4\tfrac x2 + \tfrac{x - 1}{3} = 4 becoming 3x+2(x−1)=43x + 2(x - 1) = 4. The 44 must be multiplied by 66 too: =24= 24, giving x=265x = \tfrac{26}{5}, not 65\tfrac65.

Example
Worked Example: Clearing Fractions

Solve x2+x−13=4\dfrac{x}{2} + \dfrac{x-1}{3} = 4. The LCD of 22 and 33 is 66.

6⋅x2+6⋅x−13=6⋅4multiply every term by 63x+2(x−1)=243x+2x−2=245x=26x=265\begin{aligned} 6\cdot\frac{x}{2} + 6\cdot\frac{x-1}{3} &= 6\cdot 4 &&\text{multiply every term by 6}\\ 3x + 2(x-1) &= 24\\ 3x + 2x - 2 &= 24\\ 5x &= 26\\ x &= \tfrac{26}{5} \end{aligned}
Tip

Watch for special cases. If the variable cancels and you are left with a true statement like 6=66=6, the equation is an identity (all real numbers). If you get a false statement like 3=73=7, there is no solution.

Try it
Try it: multi-step

Solve 2x+13−x−24=2\dfrac{2x + 1}{3} - \dfrac{x - 2}{4} = 2.

Show the answer

Multiply every term by 1212: 4(2x+1)−3(x−2)=244(2x + 1) - 3(x - 2) = 24. Distribute: 8x+4−3x+6=248x + 4 - 3x + 6 = 24, so 5x+10=245x + 10 = 24 and x=145x = \tfrac{14}{5}. Check: 6.63−0.84=2.2−0.2=2\tfrac{6.6}{3} - \tfrac{0.8}{4} = 2.2 - 0.2 = 2.

Literal Equations & Formulas

Concept
Solving for a Variable

A literal equation contains several letters. Solving one for a chosen variable uses the exact same inverse-operation moves as a numeric equation — just treat the other letters as constants. Undo operations in reverse order: get the target variable alone.

A formula is an equation true for all values of its letters, so the same balance moves keep it true; solving for a different letter just changes which question the formula answers. Undoing in reverse order works for the same reason as in a numeric equation: the last operation applied to the target letter is the first to be removed.

Example
Worked Example: Solve for a Variable

Solve A=12(b1+b2)hA = \tfrac{1}{2}(b_1 + b_2)h (area of a trapezoid) for b1b_1.

2A=(b1+b2)hmultiply both sides by 22Ah=b1+b2divide both sides by hb1=2Ah−b2subtract b2\begin{aligned} 2A &= (b_1 + b_2)h &&\text{multiply both sides by 2}\\ \frac{2A}{h} &= b_1 + b_2 &&\text{divide both sides by $h$}\\ b_1 &= \frac{2A}{h} - b_2 &&\text{subtract $b_2$} \end{aligned}
Side note
Where it goes wrong

Dividing only one term: from 2A=(b1+b2)h2A = (b_1 + b_2)h writing 2Ah=b1+b2h\tfrac{2A}{h} = b_1 + b_2 h. Dividing both sides by hh divides the whole right side: 2Ah=b1+b2\tfrac{2A}{h} = b_1 + b_2.

Tip

Tip: If the target variable appears in more than one term, factor it out first, then divide. Example: from ax+bx=cax + bx = c, factor to x(a+b)=cx(a+b)=c, so x=ca+bx = \dfrac{c}{a+b}.

Try it
Try it: factor to isolate

Solve S=a1−rS = \dfrac{a}{1 - r} for rr.

Show the answer

Multiply by 1−r1 - r: S(1−r)=aS(1 - r) = a, so S−Sr=aS - Sr = a. Then −Sr=a−S-Sr = a - S and r=S−aS=1−aSr = \tfrac{S - a}{S} = 1 - \tfrac aS (for S≠0S \ne 0).

Linear Inequalities & Interval Notation

Concept
Solving Inequalities

Solve an inequality just like an equation, with one crucial rule: when you multiply or divide by a negative number, flip the inequality sign. A solution is a whole range of numbers, best shown on a number line and written in interval notation.

Multiplying by a negative number reverses order because it reflects the number line through 00: −2<3-2 < 3 becomes 2>−32 > -3. Interval notation packages a solution set by its endpoints, with a round bracket for an excluded endpoint (like −3-3 in x>−3x > -3) and a square one for an included endpoint.

Always use a parenthesis next to ∞\infty or −∞-\infty — infinity is never included.

Example
Worked Example: Flipping the Sign
−6−5−4−3−2−101234
x>−3x > -3: the interval (−3,∞)(-3, \infty).

Solve −2x+5<11-2x + 5 < 11 and graph the solution.

−2x<6subtract 5x>−3divide by −2, flip the sign\begin{aligned} -2x &< 6 &&\text{subtract 5}\\ x &> -3 &&\text{divide by $-2$, \textbf{flip} the sign} \end{aligned}

Solution: x>−3x > -3, or in interval notation (−3, ∞)(-3,\ \infty).

Side note
Where it goes wrong

Writing (−3,∞](-3, \infty]. Infinity is not a number that can be reached or included, so its bracket is always round: (−3,∞)(-3, \infty).

Try it
Try it: solve and write

Solve 4−3x≥2x−114 - 3x \ge 2x - 11 and write the answer in interval notation.

Show the answer

Subtract 2x2x and 44: −5x≥−15-5x \ge -15. Divide by −5-5 and flip: x≤3x \le 3. Interval: (−∞,3](-\infty, 3].

Compound Inequalities (AND / OR)

Concept
Two Statements Joined

A compound inequality joins two inequalities.

  • AND (intersection): both must hold. Graph is the overlap — a segment between two values. Written a<x<ba < x < b, interval (a,b)(a,b).
  • OR (union): at least one holds. Graph is two rays pointing outward, interval (−∞,a)∪(b,∞)(-\infty,a)\cup(b,\infty).

AND keeps only the numbers that pass both tests, the overlap of two rays, which is one segment. OR keeps numbers passing either test, the union, typically two rays pointing apart. Solving all three parts of a<…<ba < \ldots < b together is legal because it is two inequalities being given the same treatment at once.

Example
Worked Example: AND
−4−3−2−101234
[−2,2)[-2, 2): closed at −2-2, open at 22.

Solve −1≤2x+3<7-1 \le 2x + 3 < 7.

−1−3≤2x<7−3subtract 3 from all three parts−4≤2x<4−2≤x<2divide all parts by 2\begin{aligned} -1 - 3 &\le 2x < 7 - 3 &&\text{subtract 3 from all three parts}\\ -4 &\le 2x < 4\\ -2 &\le x < 2 &&\text{divide all parts by 2} \end{aligned}

Interval notation: [−2, 2)[-2,\ 2).

Side note
Where it goes wrong

Writing an OR as a single chain: 3<x≤−23 < x \le -2. No number is both greater than 33 and at most −2-2; an OR must be written as a union of two pieces.

Example
Worked Example: OR
−5−4−3−2−10123456
(−∞,−2]∪(3,∞)(-\infty, -2] \cup (3, \infty): two rays.

Solve x−1≤−3x - 1 \le -3 or 2x>62x > 6.

x≤−2orx>3.x \le -2 \quad\text{or}\quad x > 3.

Interval notation: (−∞, −2] ∪ (3, ∞)(-\infty,\ -2]\ \cup\ (3,\ \infty).

Try it
Try it: and / or

Solve −5<1−2x≤9-5 < 1 - 2x \le 9 and write it in interval notation.

Show the answer

Subtract 11: −6<−2x≤8-6 < -2x \le 8. Divide all three parts by −2-2 and flip both signs: 3>x≥−43 > x \ge -4, that is −4≤x<3-4 \le x < 3, or [−4,3)[-4, 3).

Absolute Value Equations

Concept
Distance from Zero

∣x∣|x| is the distance of xx from 00, so it is never negative. To solve ∣ax+b∣=c|ax+b| = c with c>0c > 0, split into two cases:

ax+b=corax+b=−c.ax + b = c \qquad\text{or}\qquad ax + b = -c.

Isolate the absolute value first, before splitting.

∣u∣=c|u| = c says uu is cc units from 00, and exactly two numbers are: cc and −c-c. That is the whole reason for splitting into two cases. Isolating first matters because the rule is about the absolute value itself; 2∣x−1∣+3=92|x - 1| + 3 = 9 does not say anything is 99 units from anywhere until it becomes ∣x−1∣=3|x - 1| = 3.

Example
Worked Example: Two Solutions
−3−2−101234563.53.5
∣2x−3∣=7|2x - 3| = 7 means ∣x−1.5∣=3.5|x - 1.5| = 3.5: the points 3.53.5 from 1.51.5.

Solve ∣2x−3∣=7|2x - 3| = 7.

2x−3=7or2x−3=−72x - 3 = 7 \quad\text{or}\quad 2x - 3 = -7
2x=10⇒x=5or2x=−4⇒x=−2.2x = 10 \Rightarrow x = 5 \qquad\text{or}\qquad 2x = -4 \Rightarrow x = -2.

Solutions: x=5x = 5 or x=−2x = -2.

Side note
Where it goes wrong

Splitting before isolating: from 2∣x−1∣+3=92|x - 1| + 3 = 9 you must reach ∣x−1∣=3|x - 1| = 3 before writing the two cases. And ∣u∣=−2|u| = -2 has no solution at all.

Tip

No-solution case. An absolute value can never equal a negative number. So ∣x+4∣=−3|x+4| = -3 has no solution. Always isolate first: ∣x∣+5=2|x|+5 = 2 becomes ∣x∣=−3|x| = -3, also no solution.

Try it
Try it: isolate, then split

Solve 4−3∣x+2∣=−114 - 3|x + 2| = -11.

Show the answer

Subtract 44: −3∣x+2∣=−15-3|x + 2| = -15, so ∣x+2∣=5|x + 2| = 5. Then x+2=5x + 2 = 5 or x+2=−5x + 2 = -5: x=3x = 3 or x=−7x = -7.

Absolute Value Inequalities

Concept
“Less thAND” and “greatOR”

After isolating the absolute value (with c>0c>0):

  • ∣ax+b∣<c|ax+b| < c means −c<ax+b<c-c < ax+b < c — an AND (a segment). Less thAND.
  • ∣ax+b∣>c|ax+b| > c means ax+b<−cax+b < -c or ax+b>cax+b > c — an OR (two rays). GreatOR.

∣x−1∣≤3|x - 1| \le 3 asks for the numbers within 33 of 11: one segment around 11, an AND. ∣2x+1∣>5|2x + 1| > 5 asks for numbers far from −12-\tfrac12: everything outside a segment, two rays, an OR. Reading every absolute value as a distance decides the shape before any algebra.

Example
Worked Example: AND type
−4−3−2−10123456
Within 33 of 11: [−2,4][-2, 4].

Solve ∣x−1∣≤3|x - 1| \le 3.

−3≤x−1≤3 ⇒ −2≤x≤4.-3 \le x - 1 \le 3 \ \Rightarrow\ -2 \le x \le 4.

Interval notation: [−2, 4][-2,\ 4].

Side note
Where it goes wrong

Turning ∣x∣>4|x| > 4 into −4>x>4-4 > x > 4. That chain is impossible; "greater than" gives two separate pieces: x<−4x < -4 or x>4x > 4.

Example
Worked Example: OR type

Solve ∣2x+1∣>5|2x + 1| > 5.

2x+1<−5or2x+1>52x + 1 < -5 \quad\text{or}\quad 2x + 1 > 5
2x<−6⇒x<−3or2x>4⇒x>2.2x < -6 \Rightarrow x < -3 \qquad\text{or}\qquad 2x > 4 \Rightarrow x > 2.

Interval notation: (−∞, −3) ∪ (2, ∞)(-\infty,\ -3)\ \cup\ (2,\ \infty).

Tip

Special cases. ∣x∣<−2|x| < -2 has no solution (distance can't be negative). ∣x∣>−2|x| > -2 is all real numbers (distance is always ≥0>−2\ge 0 > -2).

Try it
Try it: two shapes

Solve ∣3x−6∣<9|3x - 6| < 9 and ∣x+5∣≥2|x + 5| \ge 2.

Show the answer

−9<3x−6<9-9 < 3x - 6 < 9, so −3<3x<15-3 < 3x < 15 and −1<x<5-1 < x < 5, the interval (−1,5)(-1, 5). Second: x+5≤−2x + 5 \le -2 or x+5≥2x + 5 \ge 2, so x≤−7x \le -7 or x≥−3x \ge -3: (−∞,−7]∪[−3,∞)(-\infty, -7] \cup [-3, \infty).

Applications & Word Problems

Concept
Translating Words

Turn the words into an equation or inequality, solve, then interpret the answer in context.

  • “at least” →≥\to \ge,   “at most” →≤\to \le,   “more than” →>\to >,   “fewer than” →<\to <.
  • Tolerance problems use absolute value: ∣measured−target∣≤tolerance|\text{measured} - \text{target}| \le \text{tolerance}.

A tolerance is a distance from a target, which is why it is written with absolute value: ∣w−8∣≤0.05|w - 8| \le 0.05 says the width is within 0.050.05 of 88. Budget and limit problems become inequalities because they ask for every value that works, not just one.

Example
Worked Example: Tolerance
7.907.958.008.058.10target 8
Acceptable widths: within 0.050.05 of 88.

A bolt must be 88 mm wide with a tolerance of 0.050.05 mm. Write and solve an inequality for acceptable widths ww.

∣w−8∣≤0.05 ⇒ −0.05≤w−8≤0.05 ⇒ 7.95≤w≤8.05.|w - 8| \le 0.05 \ \Rightarrow\ -0.05 \le w - 8 \le 0.05 \ \Rightarrow\ 7.95 \le w \le 8.05.

Acceptable widths: from 7.957.95 mm to 8.058.05 mm, i.e. [7.95, 8.05][7.95,\ 8.05].

Side note
Where it goes wrong

Rounding a limit the wrong way: "at most 8.58.5 miles" answered as 99 miles when only whole miles are allowed. Rounding up breaks the budget (3+2⋅9=21>203 + 2 \cdot 9 = 21 > 20); the answer is 88 whole miles.

Example
Worked Example: Range / Budget

A taxi charges a $3 base fee plus $2 per mile. With $20 to spend, how many miles mm can you afford?

3+2m≤20 ⇒ 2m≤17 ⇒ m≤8.5.3 + 2m \le 20 \ \Rightarrow\ 2m \le 17 \ \Rightarrow\ m \le 8.5.

You can ride at most 8.58.5 miles.

Tip

Mixture idea. If you mix xx liters of a 20%20\% solution with 55 liters of a 50%50\% solution, the acid amount is 0.20x+0.50(5)0.20x + 0.50(5), and the total volume is x+5x+5. Set the concentration equal to your target to solve.

Try it
Try it: a tolerance

A thermostat keeps a room within 1.5∘1.5^\circ of 20∘20^\circC. Write an absolute-value inequality and solve it.

Show the answer

∣T−20∣≤1.5|T - 20| \le 1.5, so −1.5≤T−20≤1.5-1.5 \le T - 20 \le 1.5 and 18.5≤T≤21.518.5 \le T \le 21.5.

Going Deeper: Advanced Ideas

Concept
Nested Absolute Values: Peel One Layer at a Time

An equation like ∣ ∣x−2∣−3 ∣=4\big|\,|x-2|-3\,\big| = 4 has an absolute value inside another. Treat the outer bars as a single unit and split first, then split again inside each branch. Each split can double the number of equations, so an outer/inner pair can yield up to four candidate solutions. Always solve from the outside in, and check every candidate back in the original — some branches collapse or produce values that fail.

Example
Worked Example: Nested Absolute Value

Solve ∣ ∣x−2∣−3 ∣=4\big|\,|x-2|-3\,\big| = 4. Let u=∣x−2∣u = |x-2|, so ∣u−3∣=4|u-3| = 4.

u−3=4oru−3=−4split the outer barsu=7u=−1\begin{aligned} u - 3 &= 4 &&\text{or}& u - 3 &= -4 &&\text{split the outer bars}\\ u &= 7 &&& u &= -1 \end{aligned}

Since u=∣x−2∣≥0u = |x-2| \ge 0, the branch u=−1u=-1 is rejected. Keep u=7u = 7:

∣x−2∣=7 ⇒ x−2=7  or  x−2=−7 ⇒ x=9  or  x=−5.|x-2| = 7 \ \Rightarrow\ x - 2 = 7 \ \text{ or }\ x - 2 = -7 \ \Rightarrow\ x = 9 \ \text{ or }\ x = -5.

Check: ∣ ∣9−2∣−3 ∣=∣7−3∣=4\big|\,|9-2|-3\,\big| = |7-3| = 4 ✓ and ∣ ∣−5−2∣−3 ∣=∣7−3∣=4\big|\,|{-5}-2|-3\,\big| = |7-3| = 4 ✓. Solutions: x=9x = 9 or x=−5x = -5.

Concept
Summed Absolute Values: Full Casework by Critical Points

To solve ∣x−a∣+∣x−b∣=c|x-a| + |x-b| = c you cannot square or split into two — instead find the critical points where each expression changes sign (x=ax=a and x=bx=b). These break the number line into three regions. On each region every bar opens with a fixed sign, so the equation becomes ordinary linear. Solve on each region and keep only the roots that land inside that region.

Example
Worked Example: Summed Absolute Values by Regions

Solve ∣x−1∣+∣x+2∣=7|x-1| + |x+2| = 7. Critical points: x=1x=1 and x=−2x=-2.

Region I: x<−2x < -2. Both bars flip: −(x−1)−(x+2)=7-(x-1) - (x+2) = 7.

−x+1−x−2=7⇒−2x−1=7⇒x=−4.\begin{aligned} -x + 1 - x - 2 &= 7 &&\Rightarrow& -2x - 1 &= 7 &&\Rightarrow& x &= -4. \end{aligned}

Since −4<−2-4 < -2, keep x=−4x = -4.

Region II: −2≤x≤1-2 \le x \le 1. Then ∣x−1∣=−(x−1)|x-1| = -(x-1), ∣x+2∣=x+2|x+2| = x+2:

−(x−1)+(x+2)=3≠7.-(x-1) + (x+2) = 3 \ne 7.

The variable cancels to a false statement, so no solution here (the sum is constant at 33 between the points — the minimum distance).

Region III: x>1x > 1. Both bars open positively: (x−1)+(x+2)=7(x-1) + (x+2) = 7.

2x+1=7 ⇒ x=3.2x + 1 = 7 \ \Rightarrow\ x = 3.

Since 3>13 > 1, keep x=3x = 3. Solutions: x=−4x = -4 or x=3x = 3.

Concept
The Distance Interpretation of ∣x−a∣+∣x−b∣|x-a|+|x-b|

Read ∣x−a∣|x-a| as “the distance from xx to aa.” Then ∣x−a∣+∣x−b∣|x-a| + |x-b| is the total distance from xx to the two fixed points aa and bb. This gives instant intuition:

  • The sum is minimized for any xx between aa and bb, where it equals ∣a−b∣|a-b|, the gap itself.
  • ∣x−a∣+∣x−b∣=c|x-a| + |x-b| = c has no solution if c<∣a−b∣c < |a-b|, infinitely many (the whole segment) if c=∣a−b∣c = |a-b|, and exactly two symmetric solutions if c>∣a−b∣c > |a-b|.
  • ∣x−a∣≤∣x−b∣|x-a| \le |x-b| means “xx is at least as close to aa” — the solution is the half-line on aa's side of the midpoint a+b2\tfrac{a+b}{2}.
Tip

Quick check with the gap. In the example above a=1a=1, b=−2b=-2, so the gap is ∣a−b∣=3|a-b| = 3. Because we wanted the sum to equal 7>37 > 3, the distance rule promises exactly two solutions before any algebra — matching x=−4x=-4 and x=3x=3. If the right side had been 22 (less than 33), you could stop immediately: no solution.

Concept
Systems of Absolute-Value Inequalities Define Regions

A single absolute-value inequality in xx and yy carves the plane into a shape; a system intersects several such shapes.

  • ∣x∣≤p|x| \le p is the vertical strip −p≤x≤p-p \le x \le p; ∣y∣≤q|y| \le q is a horizontal strip. Together they form a rectangle.
  • ∣x∣+∣y∣≤r|x| + |y| \le r is a diamond (square rotated 45∘45^\circ) with vertices at (±r,0)(\pm r, 0) and (0,±r)(0, \pm r).
  • ∣y∣≥∣x∣|y| \ge |x| is the pair of “bowtie” wedges opening up and down.

Sketch each boundary, decide inside vs. outside with a test point (the origin is easiest when it is not on a boundary), then shade the overlap.

Example
Worked Example: A Region from Two Absolute-Value Inequalities

Describe the region satisfying both ∣x∣+∣y∣≤4|x| + |y| \le 4 and ∣x∣≥1|x| \ge 1.

The first inequality is the diamond with vertices (±4,0)(\pm 4, 0) and (0,±4)(0, \pm 4), including the interior. The second, ∣x∣≥1|x| \ge 1, means x≤−1x \le -1 or x≥1x \ge 1 — everything except the vertical strip −1<x<1-1 < x < 1.

Test the origin (0,0)(0,0): it satisfies ∣0∣+∣0∣=0≤4|0|+|0| = 0 \le 4 (inside the diamond) but fails ∣0∣≥1|0| \ge 1. So the origin is excluded, confirming we remove the central band. The solution is the diamond with a vertical slot of width 22 cut out of its middle — two symmetric “wing” pieces, one with x≥1x \ge 1 and one with x≤−1x \le -1, each bounded by the diamond's edges.

Concept
Parameter Conditions for a Solution Set

Sometimes the unknown is a parameter that controls whether — and how many — solutions exist. Isolate the absolute value and compare with the structure rules:

  • ∣ax+b∣=k|ax+b| = k has two solutions if k>0k>0, one if k=0k=0, none if k<0k<0.
  • ∣ax+b∣<k|ax+b| < k has solutions only if k>0k > 0 (if k≤0k \le 0 the solution set is empty).
  • ∣ax+b∣>k|ax+b| > k is all reals when k<0k < 0, and all reals except one point when k=0k = 0.

Translate the requested behavior into an inequality on the parameter, then solve that.

Example
Worked Example: Choosing a Parameter

For which values of kk does ∣3x−6∣=k−1|3x - 6| = k - 1 have exactly two solutions?

The left side is a genuine absolute value, so it produces two solutions precisely when the right side is strictly positive:

k−1>0 ⇒ k>1.k - 1 > 0 \ \Rightarrow\ k > 1.

For k=1k = 1 the equation is ∣3x−6∣=0|3x-6| = 0, giving the single solution x=2x = 2; for k<1k < 1 the right side is negative and there is no solution. Answer: k>1k > 1, i.e. k∈(1,∞)k \in (1, \infty).

Concept
Inequalities Solved by Substitution

When an inequality contains a repeated chunk, let a new variable stand for it. Solving (x2−1)2−5(x2−1)+4≤0(x^2-1)^2 - 5(x^2-1) + 4 \le 0 is hopeless head-on, but with u=x2−1u = x^2 - 1 it becomes u2−5u+4≤0u^2 - 5u + 4 \le 0, i.e. (u−1)(u−4)≤0(u-1)(u-4) \le 0, giving 1≤u≤41 \le u \le 4. Back-substitute and solve the resulting compound inequality — often itself an absolute-value or interval statement. The same trick tames ∣x∣2−3∣x∣≥0|x|^2 - 3|x| \ge 0 via u=∣x∣≥0u = |x| \ge 0.

Example
Worked Example: Substitution in an Absolute-Value Inequality

Solve ∣x∣2−3∣x∣−4≤0|x|^2 - 3|x| - 4 \le 0. Let u=∣x∣u = |x|, where u≥0u \ge 0.

u2−3u−4≤0substitute(u−4)(u+1)≤0factor−1≤u≤4sign chart between the roots\begin{aligned} u^2 - 3u - 4 &\le 0 &&\text{substitute}\\ (u-4)(u+1) &\le 0 &&\text{factor}\\ -1 \le u &\le 4 &&\text{sign chart between the roots} \end{aligned}

But u=∣x∣≥0u = |x| \ge 0 forces 0≤u≤40 \le u \le 4, i.e. ∣x∣≤4|x| \le 4. Therefore

−4≤x≤4,interval notation [−4, 4].-4 \le x \le 4, \qquad\text{interval notation } [-4,\ 4].
Tip

Interval-notation subtleties.

  • An empty solution set is written ∅\varnothing, not (a,a)(a,a) loosely — although (a,a)(a,a) does denote the empty set, prefer ∅\varnothing for clarity.
  • A single isolated point {a}\{a\} is not an interval; write it with set braces, e.g. ∣x−3∣≤0|x-3| \le 0 gives {3}\{3\}.
  • A union must list pieces left to right and stay disjoint: (−∞,−2)∪(2,∞)(-\infty,-2)\cup(2,\infty), never overlapping or out of order.
  • “All real numbers” is (−∞, ∞)(-\infty,\ \infty); a punctured line like x≠5x \ne 5 is (−∞,5)∪(5,∞)(-\infty,5)\cup(5,\infty).
  • Always pair ∞\infty and −∞-\infty with a parenthesis, never a bracket — they are directions, not attainable endpoints.
Try it
Quick check

d=rtd = rt; solve for tt.

Work it on paper before revealing the answer.

Show the answer

Answer: t=drt = \dfrac{d}{r}

Why It Works

∣u∣<5|u| < 5 says the distance from uu to 00 is less than 55, i.e. uu lies within 55 of 00 on the number line — the interval (−5,5)(-5, 5). ∣u∣>5|u| > 5 says the distance exceeds 55: uu is beyond −5-5 or beyond 55, two separate rays. Distance is the whole story, and every absolute-value rule is a sentence about distance translated into inequalities.

Tip
Reading a proof

Do not read a proof the way you read a rule. Cover the last line, ask what the previous line forces, and only then uncover it. If a step feels like magic, that is the step to work by hand with a concrete number.

Formulas, Proofs & Tips

Tip
Absolute value equations and inequalities
∣X∣=c  ⟺  X=±c;∣X∣<c  ⟺  −c<X<c;∣X∣>c  ⟺  X<−c or X>c|X|=c \iff X=\pm c;\qquad |X|<c \iff -c<X<c;\qquad |X|>c \iff X<-c \text{ or } X>c

What it means. ∣X∣|X| is distance from zero, so these say "distance equal to / less than / greater than cc".

Example. ∣x−3∣<2  ⟺  1<x<5|x-3|<2\iff 1<x<5; ∣x−3∣=2  ⟺  x=1|x-3|=2\iff x=1 or x=5x=5.

Why it works. Distance cc from 00 is reached at both cc and −c-c. Points closer than cc form the single interval between them; points farther than cc form the two pieces outside.

Tip. "Less than" gives and (one interval); "greater than" gives or (two pieces). If c<0c<0, ∣X∣<c|X|<c has no solutions at all.