Square Roots & Perfect Squares
A square root of a number is a value that, when multiplied by itself, gives . Because , we say is a square root of .
The symbol is called the radical sign. The number under it is the radicand. The small number tucked into the notch is the index (it is a hidden for square roots).
A perfect square is a number whose square root is a whole number (like ).
A square root is the positive number whose square is the radicand. Simplify by pulling perfect-square factors out, add only like radicals, multiply radicands together, and rationalize a denominator by multiplying by a well-chosen . Solving radical equations means isolating the root and squaring — then checking, because squaring can invent solutions.
The square root is the side of a square with a given area, which is why it is called a square root: unit tiles make a -by- square. The radical sign names the principal (non-negative) root because a side length cannot be negative; the negative root, , is written when it is wanted.
Every positive number really has two square roots: and . The symbol always means the principal (positive) root.
Also, , and you cannot take in Algebra 1 (there is no real number that squares to a negative).
Evaluate . Ask: what positive number times itself is ? Since , we get .
Believing . Test it: , but . Roots split over products, never over sums.
Perfect Squares to Know by Heart
1.3
Remember: for a positive number . Squaring and taking a square root are opposite (inverse) operations.
Evaluate , , , and .
Show the answerHide the answer
. . . (not : the principal root is non-negative).
Estimating Irrational Square Roots
If a number is not a perfect square, its square root is irrational (a never-ending, non-repeating decimal). We estimate it by finding the two nearest perfect squares.
Larger squares have larger sides, so square roots keep order: forces . To go further, square a guess: is a little too big and a little too small, so lies between them. Squaring is easy, so it is the tool for checking any root estimate.
Find perfect squares just below and above :
Since is very close to , the value is a good estimate.
Placing proportionally at "" and then trusting more decimal places than that estimate supports. It gives about ; the true value is Squares are not evenly spaced, so check a proportional estimate by squaring.
Tip: The bigger the radicand, the bigger the root, but the root grows slowly. Whenever the radicand sits closer to the lower perfect square, the root sits closer to the lower integer.
Between which consecutive integers is ? Estimate it to one decimal place.
Show the answerHide the answer
, so . Test and : is just above , so .
Simplifying Square Roots (Product Property)
For non-negative numbers and :
To simplify, factor the radicand so that one factor is the largest perfect square you can find, then pull its root out front.
The product property holds because , so is a non-negative number whose square is , which is exactly what means. Pulling out the largest perfect-square factor finishes in one step; any smaller square factor leaves another to pull out later.
Pulling out the factor itself instead of its root: . Only the square root of the perfect square comes out: , so . Check: , while .
If you had used a smaller factor, say , you are not done: , so . Same answer, more steps.
Fully simplified means the radicand has no perfect-square factors left (other than ).
Simplify , and .
Show the answerHide the answer
. . .
Radicals with Variables
Since (for ), any even power under a square root leaves half its exponent outside:
For an odd power, split off one factor: , so .
A square root halves an exponent because squaring doubles it: , so (for ). An odd power has one factor left over after pairing, and that single factor stays under the radical.
Pull out the perfect-square number () and the even power (); leave the rest inside.
Taking the square root of an exponent instead of halving it: . Halve: , since , while .
Simplify for .
Show the answerHide the answer
, , is a perfect square. Pull out , , : .
Adding & Subtracting Radicals
Radicals are like when they have the same index and the same radicand. Add or subtract only the numbers in front (the coefficients); the radical stays the same, just like combining like terms.
Often you must simplify first before you can tell that radicals are alike.
Like radicals combine the same way like terms do, by the distributive property: . Here plays the role of . Unlike radicals, such as and , are different "units" and cannot be merged, just as cannot.
Adding radicands: . Numerically , but . Simplify each first: .
Warning: . For example , but . You can only combine radicals that are already alike; unlike radicals such as stay separate.
Simplify .
Show the answerHide the answer
, , . All are multiples of : , so .
Multiplying Radicals
Multiply the coefficients together and the radicands together, then simplify the result.
Multiplying radicals uses the product property in the combining direction: , and coefficients multiply as usual because multiplication can be rearranged. Conjugates, , are the difference-of-squares pattern, and they are useful precisely because squaring a square root removes it.
Multiplying a coefficient into the radicand: . Coefficients stay outside: . Check numerically: , while .
Distribute: .
Difference of squares :
The radicals vanish! This trick powers rationalizing below.
Key fact: . Squaring a square root undoes it.
Multiply and .
Show the answerHide the answer
FOIL: . .
Dividing & Rationalizing
A denominator should never keep a radical. To rationalize, multiply the top and bottom by the radical in the denominator so it becomes a perfect square.
Rationalizing multiplies by a clever form of , , so the value does not change, only its appearance. The reason to do it is practical: is easy to compare, combine and estimate (), while dividing by an irrational number is awkward, and it makes equal answers look identical.
Multiplying only the denominator: ("the root cancels"). That changes the value; the top must be multiplied too: , matching .
Rationalize and ().
Show the answerHide the answer
. .
The Pythagorean Theorem
In a right triangle, the two shorter sides (legs) and and the longest side (hypotenuse) satisfy
Solve for the missing side, then leave the answer in simplified radical form unless a decimal is asked for.
Most right triangles have irrational sides, which is why radicals and the Pythagorean theorem arrive together: legs and give a hypotenuse whose square is , and no fraction squares to . Simplified radical form keeps the exact value instead of a rounded decimal.
Legs , :
Adding when a leg is missing: . The hypotenuse is the longest side, so the leg must be shorter than ; subtract: .
Hypotenuse , leg :
A square has diagonal . Find its side in simplified radical form.
Show the answerHide the answer
The side and the diagonal form a right triangle with two legs : , so and .
Cube Roots (A Brief Look)
A cube root asks: what number cubed gives ? Because , we get . Unlike square roots, cube roots of negatives are allowed: since .
Perfect cubes: . Simplify by pulling out perfect-cube factors.
Cube roots allow negative radicands because cubing keeps the sign: , so . Square roots cannot, because every real number squared is non-negative. Simplifying uses the largest perfect-cube factor, the same idea as perfect squares.
Solving Square-Root Equations
To solve an equation with a variable under a radical:
- Isolate the radical on one side.
- Square both sides to remove the radical.
- Solve the resulting equation.
- Check every answer in the original equation.
Squaring both sides is a one-way step: if then , but also allows . So squaring can admit new "solutions" that were never solutions of the original, which is why every answer must be checked. On a graph, is always at least , so an equation like has no solution even though squaring produces one.
Check: . ✓
Squaring before isolating: squared as , giving . is , not . Isolate the root first.
Why check? Squaring can create extraneous solutions, answers that appear valid but fail the original equation. For instance, has no solution (a principal root is never negative), even though squaring gives . Always test your answers.
Solve .
Show the answerHide the answer
Square: , so and . Check : , true. Check : , extraneous. Solution: .
Going Deeper: Advanced Radicals
The index does not have to be or . In general, asks for the number whose th power is . There is a powerful bridge between roots and exponents:
The denominator of the exponent is the index (the root); the numerator is the ordinary power. Once a radical is written this way, every exponent rule you already know applies.
Simplify and write the answer as a radical.
Even vs. odd index. An odd index (like or ) accepts negative radicands; an even index (like or ) does not allow a negative radicand in the real numbers.
When a denominator is a sum or difference of terms involving radicals, one factor is not enough. Multiply top and bottom by the conjugate, the same two terms with the middle sign flipped. The difference of squares then erases the radical:
The conjugate of is ; the conjugate of is .
Rationalize .
No radical remains in the denominator, so the expression is fully rationalized.
A radical inside a radical such as can sometimes be denested into . The idea: assume and square both sides:
Match the parts without a radical to each other and the parts with a radical to each other:
Find two numbers that add to and multiply to : they are and . Hence
Check by squaring. Denesting is only valid if it survives a check: . ✓ If no nice pair of numbers exists, the radical simply cannot be denested.
Solve .
So or . Check both in the original equation:
Only works; is extraneous and is thrown out.
Place two points and on the plane. The horizontal gap is a leg of length and the vertical gap is a leg of length ; the straight-line distance between the points is the hypotenuse. Feeding the legs into gives
The distance formula is nothing new to memorize, it is just the Pythagorean theorem wearing coordinates.
Find the distance between and .
Sums and differences of unlike radicals will not merge, but you can still simplify products and squares of them. Treat and like binomial terms and use :
The first stays irrational (a nested-looking form); the second collapses to a plain integer whenever and are.
Simplify .
Why It Works
for non-negative because and — it is the positive number whose square is , which is the definition of . Squaring an equation is not reversible: becomes , which also has the solution . That is why every radical equation needs its candidates checked; the extraneous ones are the ghosts of the sign the squaring erased.
Do not read a proof the way you read a rule. Cover the last line, ask what the previous line forces, and only then uncover it. If a step feels like magic, that is the step to work by hand with a concrete number.
Formulas, Proofs & Tips
What it means. Roots split over multiplication and division, and a fractional exponent is a root.
Example. , and .
Why it works. is defined as the number whose th power is , so — exactly the definition of . The product rule then follows from .
Tip. Roots do not split over addition: . Test with if you are ever tempted.