Making Long Computations Short
Partial fractions turn into , so the sum telescopes: .
In plain terms. Write each term as a difference; everything in the middle cancels.
Example. .
Why it works. If every term has the form , then in the sum each intermediate appears once with a plus sign (from term ) and once with a minus sign (from term ), so only the first and last survive. Partial fractions is the tool that FINDS the form when a term is a rational function.
When each state comes from the previous ones — like — compute forward from the base cases rather than hunting for a formula.
In plain terms. Build the answer step by step; ten steps of arithmetic beat an hour of algebra.
Example. Climbing 5 stairs taking 1 or 2 at a time: — there are ways (a Fibonacci-type recursion).
Why it works. A recursion says the count for size is built from counts for smaller sizes, so computing upward from the base cases is an exact method, not an approximation. On the AIME, where is usually below , a table of values is often faster and safer than a closed form.
In how many ways can you climb a staircase of steps if each stride covers , or steps?
Spotting it. Condition on the last stride: it covered , or steps, leaving a staircase of , or .
Step 1. with , , .
Step 2. . The answer is .
Ptolemy's theorem ( in a cyclic quadrilateral) and the Power of a Point ( for chords through ) often chain together in one problem.
In plain terms. In circle problems, name the theorem each length fact comes from and the algebra falls out.
Example. Cyclic with diameter , , , , : Ptolemy gives .
Pairing the wrong sides in Ptolemy. The product of the DIAGONALS equals the sum of the products of OPPOSITE sides. In the example, using adjacent sides instead, , gives rather than . And the theorem needs a cyclic quadrilateral; for any other quadrilateral the equality becomes a strict inequality.
In how many ways can you climb stairs with strides of , or steps?
Show the answerHide the answer
With and , : . The answer is .
Finding the Difference That Telescopes
A rational term with factored denominator splits into pieces whose difference telescopes: .
With a gap of , two terms survive at each end instead of one: . Counting the survivors correctly is where the points are; writing out the first three and last three terms explicitly makes it visible.
A product telescopes when each factor is a ratio of consecutive values: .
Factorial-heavy products usually hide such a ratio: splits into two telescoping products and leaves . Writing each factor as (something at )/(something at ) is the deciding step.
Compute .
Step 1 — .
Step 2 — the surviving terms are .
Step 3 — .
in lowest terms. Find .
Spotting it. Factor: and . The key observation is : the quadratic factor on top at is the one on the bottom at .
Step 1. The product splits as .
Step 2. The first is (a gap-two telescope: survive on top, below). The second telescopes to .
Step 3. The product is , so .
Counting survivors wrong. With a gap of , TWO terms survive at each end: keeps at the front and at the back. Keeping only (as if the gap were ) is the standard error. Write out the first three and last three terms and cross off what cancels.
Compute .
Show the answerHide the answer
Each factor is , so the product is .
Telescoping Beyond Fractions
Useful differences: ; ; ; .
Why it works. If every term is , the sum from to is , because each intermediate appears once with each sign. The skill is guessing from the shape of the term: factorials suggest factorials, square roots suggest conjugates, a product of consecutive factors suggests a product with one factor fewer. Always test the guess at .
Find the remainder when is divided by .
Spotting it. .
Step 1. The sum telescopes to .
Step 2. is divisible by (it contains and ), so .
in lowest terms. Find .
Spotting it. A product of three consecutive factors: compare it with products of two. .
Step 1. So the sum is .
Step 2. .
in lowest terms. Find .
Spotting it. Factor out of the denominator: . Then rationalise.
Step 1. .
Step 2. The sum telescopes to , so .
Guessing a difference without testing it. It is tempting to write , but at the left side is and the right side is : off by a factor of . One substitution catches the missing .
Compute .
Show the answerHide the answer
Each term is , so the sum is .